This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug tree-optimization/49772] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in ipa_pta_execute, at tree-ssa-structalias.c:6790 with -fipa-pta
- From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 11:39:21 +0000
- Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/49772] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in ipa_pta_execute, at tree-ssa-structalias.c:6790 with -fipa-pta
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-49772-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49772
--- Comment #12 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-12-08 11:39:21 UTC ---
It's a complete mystery to me how this cgraph node cloning and edge code
works. We create the inline clone for a completely different edge
(that _is_ decided to be inlined) than the one we later fail on
(that one is _not_ marked inline and does _not_ have an inline clone callee).
Thus, we shouldn't arrive at this situation at all. Instead we seem to fail
to inline a call that we should inline (and decided to inline) because of:
/* Expand calls to inline functions in the body of FN. */
unsigned int
optimize_inline_calls (tree fn)
{
...
/* There is no point in performing inlining if errors have already
occurred -- and we might crash if we try to inline invalid
code. */
if (seen_error ())
return 0;
which leaves us with such state.
So this is yet another case of overeager fail to complete our task.
I suppose we can remove that late fail now that we bail out way earlier
at proper IPA "scope".
The ICE is fixed with removing the above out.