This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug target/50749] SH Target: Post-increment addressing used only for first memory access


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50749

--- Comment #5 from Oleg Endo <oleg.endo@t-online.de> 2011-10-30 12:36:51 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> 
> I'm a bit curious to see what happens if they are changed
> to non-zero for SI/DImode.

..not much actually. I've tried defining both as TARGET_SH1 and compared 
before/after CSiBE results.  No code size changes at all.  Also the micro test
cases do not seem to be affected by that.  Of course I might have missed some
border case...


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]