This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/50182] Performance degradation from gcc 4.1 (x86_64)
- From: "xinliangli at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 19:58:23 +0000
- Subject: [Bug target/50182] Performance degradation from gcc 4.1 (x86_64)
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-50182-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50182
--- Comment #22 from davidxl <xinliangli at gmail dot com> 2011-10-24 19:58:23 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #21)
> OK, just in case, here is my current test.
Preprocessed test case? I saw the main assembly difference that can explain the
performance diff, but want to make sure it is not due to your new source change
(I saw some print statement addeded).
David