This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/50694] SH Target: SH2A little endian does not actually work
- From: "oleg dot endo at t-online dot de" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 18:44:32 +0000
- Subject: [Bug target/50694] SH Target: SH2A little endian does not actually work
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-50694-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50694
--- Comment #7 from Oleg Endo <oleg.endo@t-online.de> 2011-10-20 18:44:32 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > I'll send in a patch with a couple of other cosmetic changes later, OK?
>
> Please go for it.
..or maybe just leave it as it is :T
The change I was suggesting opens up another problem with multilib and endian
config / selection.
I think instead of adding / implementing the endian restrictions it would be
more useful to expand little endian support in binutils and drop the endian
restrictions in gcc altogether once binutils fully support it.
What do you think? Would that make more sense in the end?