This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/50678] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: c52104y on x86_64-apple-darwin10
- From: "iains at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 16:22:10 +0000
- Subject: [Bug target/50678] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: c52104y on x86_64-apple-darwin10
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-50678-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50678
--- Comment #47 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-10-18 16:22:10 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #46)
> > that seems reasonable if the result can be cached - otherwise it's potentially
> > a big hit.
>
> We don't really care about performances here: a signal has been raised and
> we're about to throw a DWARF exception, so everything is already quite costly.
> But saving the result in a static variable should indeed be possible.
OK, that's fair... mine for now (will try and cook sth up).