This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug fortran/47023] C_Sizeof: Rejects valid code


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47023

--- Comment #20 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-18 12:17:42 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #19)
> > >  * reject proc-pointers for SIZEOF (comment #7)

I think one could also allow them, but then the implementation of SIZEOF needs
to be fixed to give the size of the pointer.

Draft patch:


Index: gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.c    (revision 180129)
+++ gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.c    (working copy)
@@ -5088,8 +5088,11 @@ gfc_conv_intrinsic_sizeof (gfc_se *se, gfc_expr *e

       gfc_conv_expr_reference (&argse, arg);

-      type = TREE_TYPE (build_fold_indirect_ref_loc (input_location,
-                         argse.expr));
+      if (arg->ts.type == BT_PROCEDURE)
+    type = TREE_TYPE (argse.expr);
+      else
+    type = TREE_TYPE (build_fold_indirect_ref_loc (input_location,
+                               argse.expr));

       /* Obtain the source word length.  */
       if (arg->ts.type == BT_CHARACTER)


With this the test case in comment #19 gives:

                    8
                    8
                    4

which is ok, apart from the fact that sizeof(proc) should be rejected.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]