This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug bootstrap/50237] [4.7 regression] comparison failure caused by HAVE_INITFINI_ARRAY check
- From: "joseph at codesourcery dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 15:27:44 +0000
- Subject: [Bug bootstrap/50237] [4.7 regression] comparison failure caused by HAVE_INITFINI_ARRAY check
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-50237-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50237
--- Comment #12 from joseph at codesourcery dot com <joseph at codesourcery dot com> 2011-08-31 15:27:44 UTC ---
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50237
>
> --- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> 2011-08-31 04:21:53 UTC ---
> (In reply to comment #10)
> > On Tue, 30 Aug 2011, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote:
> >
> > > The main issue is mixing input .ctors sections with .init_array sections
> > > to generate the single output .init_array section. Not all linkers support
> > > it even if they support .init_array section. How should we properly
> > > test this?
> >
> > Is it not possible to link (with -r, maybe) objects and examine the output
> > with target objdump to see if .ctors sections are still present?
>
> "ld -r" won't/shouldn't combine different sections. We
> can use ld to generate executables. How can we check if
> input .ctors.* and .init_array.* sections are placed
> in the right order?
Arrange for the contents to have appropriate text values you can check for
with grep (or if you wish a custom C program to run on the build system to
examine ELF structures - only ELF needs to be considered for this, after
all, and I think at this point you may even be able to rely on having
libiberty already built for the build system, complete with the
simple-object-elf code).