This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/50164] [IRA, 4.7 Regression] Performance degradation due to increased memory instructions count
- From: "hjl.tools at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 13:58:28 +0000
- Subject: [Bug target/50164] [IRA, 4.7 Regression] Performance degradation due to increased memory instructions count
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-50164-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50164
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> 2011-08-25 13:58:28 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > Yesterday I sent a patch
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-08/msg01954.html which most probably
> > solved the problem.
> >
> > Now I have code size 419 (gcc 4.6) vs 411 (gcc as of Aug 24) bytes for the
> > test.
>
> I tried it but unfortunately it did not solve the regression. We still have xk
> on the stack and x1.5 more memory accesses in GCC 4.7 assembly for mentioned
> code part. GCC 4.6 produces bigger but faster code.
>
Can you find which checkin caused this?