This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libstdc++/50160] vector<bool> comparison very slow (no specialisation)
- From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 16:31:40 +0000
- Subject: [Bug libstdc++/50160] vector<bool> comparison very slow (no specialisation)
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-50160-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50160
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2011-08-23 16:31:40 UTC ---
I meant: which improvement do you expect, in practice? I supposed you are aware
if other implementations of the library already including the optimization. I'm
looking for some concrete evidence, because you know, vector<bool> is
deprecated, isn't a real container, and all the well known bad things about it,
thus we normally don't do much development work on it beyond ghe basic
maintainance. Of course, if you have already a patch, that would definitely
speed things up ;)