This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug libstdc++/1773] __cplusplus defined to 1, should be 199711L


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1773

--- Comment #84 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> 2011-07-21 12:14:17 UTC ---
> --- Comment #83 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2011-07-21 12:08:32 UTC ---
> Ok, thus I marked 30112 as blocking this, I'll try to raise its priority.

Fine, thanks.

> Otherwise Rainer, ok, in terms of producing an actual patch I was addressing
> mostly Marc, but, unless I'm badly misremembering, something *should* be
> special about Solaris, eg I'm pretty sure I can fix the macro for systems using
> glibc without major problems. Thus it would be great if you could coordinate

IIUC the major problem is that the Solaris headers (at least since
Solaris 10) are (fully?) C++ aware, while glibc is not, so we were
running into conflicts.  I brought the issue and my findings with fixing
Solaris headers to avoid the conflicts up with the Solaris C++ and libc
engineers, and there was major opposition to `fixing' them for the
benefit of libstdc++ if the problem is mostly on the libstdc++ side.

> with Marc in terms of extensive testing on Solaris...

Sure, no problem: I've got an extensive test farm over here, from
Solaris 8 to 11, both x86 and SPARC.  As soon as something is ready for
testing, I'm prepared :-)

    Rainer


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]