This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug target/47744] [x32] ICE: in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:403


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47744

--- Comment #34 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> 2011-07-18 16:55:35 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #33)
> 
> Please also note, that there is no need for new lea_x32 patterns anymore.

My x32 branch has



2011-07-18  Uros Bizjak  <ubizjak@gmail.com>

    PR target/47744
    * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_decompose_address): Allow only subregs
    of DImode hard regs in PLUS chains. 

2011-07-17  H.J. Lu  <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>

    * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_decompose_address): Don't support
    32bit address in x32 mode.

2011-07-17  H.J. Lu  <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>

    * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_fixup_binary_operands): Revert x32
    change.

2011-07-17  H.J. Lu  <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>

    * config/i386/i386.md (*lea_0_x32): Removed.
    (*lea_2_x32): Likewise.
    (*lea_2_zext_x32): Likewise.
    (X32 LEA zero-extend split): Likewise.

2011-07-17  Uros Bizjak  <ubizjak@gmail.com>

    PR target/47744
    * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_decompose_address): Properly handle
    SUBREG for x32.

2011-07-17  H.J. Lu  <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>

    * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_simplify_base_index_disp): Removed.
    (ix86_decompose_address): Don't call it.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]