This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c/49595] on amd64, sizeof(__int128_t) > sizeof(intmax_t)
- From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:43:16 +0000
- Subject: [Bug c/49595] on amd64, sizeof(__int128_t) > sizeof(intmax_t)
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-49595-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49595
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-06-30 17:42:59 UTC ---
sizeof(intmax_t) is fixed by various LP64 ABIs and cannot be changed
I believe the stock answer is that __int128 is not a C99 extended integer type,
so isn't one of the types that intmax_t can represent the value of