This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug regression/49572] [4.4 Regression]: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030709-2.c scan-tree-dump-times cddce2 ".rtmem" 0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49572

Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2011.06.29 06:56:29
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-06-29 06:56:29 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Nope, not on 4.6 either; it's just 4.4.  Is it possible that the patch was
> backported too far?

The bug was present on the 4.4 branch and is fixed by the patch so the first
answer is no.  Now some optimizations might rely on it.  Present on x86 too.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]