This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/45511] ICE in neon_valid_immediate, at config/arm/arm.c:8294
- From: "joseph at codesourcery dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 21:07:33 +0000
- Subject: [Bug target/45511] ICE in neon_valid_immediate, at config/arm/arm.c:8294
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-45511-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45511
--- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com <joseph at codesourcery dot com> 2011-06-16 21:07:00 UTC ---
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011, rmansfield at qnx dot com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45511
>
> Ryan Mansfield <rmansfield at qnx dot com> changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> CC| |ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
>
> --- Comment #4 from Ryan Mansfield <rmansfield at qnx dot com> 2011-06-16 20:17:00 UTC ---
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > I don't see this with an arm-linux-gnu toolchain for r163798.
>
> Were you using a 64 bit host?
>
> 8486 if (immtype == 17)
> 8487 {
> 8488 /* FIXME: Broken on 32-bit H_W_I hosts. */
> 8489 gcc_assert (sizeof (HOST_WIDE_INT) == 8);
EABI targets force 64-bit HOST_WIDE_INT, so the vast majority of users of
the ARM port won't hit this assert. If you really care about old-ABI
targets (and deprecation of arm-linux-gnu and arm-elf is long overdue),
maybe ARM should just force 64-bit HOST_WIDE_INT unconditionally.