This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug fortran/49074] [OOP] Defined assignment w/ CLASS arrays: Incomplete error message


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49074

janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot       |janus at gcc dot gnu.org
                   |gnu.org                     |

--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-16 18:24:15 UTC ---
Ok, in fact we just fail to propagate the locus when replacing the assignment
with the corresponding type-bound call. The following one-liner fixes it:


Index: gcc/fortran/interface.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/fortran/interface.c    (revision 175100)
+++ gcc/fortran/interface.c    (working copy)
@@ -3242,6 +3242,7 @@ gfc_extend_assign (gfc_code *c, gfc_namespace *ns)
       c->expr1 = gfc_get_expr ();
       build_compcall_for_operator (c->expr1, actual, tb_base, tbo, gname);
       c->expr1->value.compcall.assign = 1;
+      c->expr1->where = c->loc;
       c->expr2 = NULL;
       c->op = EXEC_COMPCALL;


With this one gets the correct error message:

        foobar = [bar(1), bar(2)]
                                 1
Error: Non-scalar base object at (1) currently not implemented


Will commit as obvious after regtesting.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]