This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/43052] Inline memcmp is *much* slower than glibc's
- From: "hjl.tools at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:14:31 +0000
- Subject: [Bug target/43052] Inline memcmp is *much* slower than glibc's
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-43052-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43052
H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC|Serge.Pavlov.at.gnu at |sergos.gnu at gmail dot com
|gmail dot com |
--- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> 2011-06-13 18:14:26 UTC ---
The basic string/memory functions in glibc 2.13 or above are
super faster in all cases. GCC can't beat glibc if function
call overhead is low.