This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libstdc++/49386] #undef min/max is dependent on order if #include
- From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 09:44:18 +0000
- Subject: [Bug libstdc++/49386] #undef min/max is dependent on order if #include
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-49386-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49386
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed| |2011.06.13 09:43:36
CC| |dave.korn.cygwin at gmail
| |dot com
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #8 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2011-06-13 09:43:36 UTC ---
Let's ask Dave's opinion on this. A possibility I can see is doing the dirty
undefs only when _WIN32, __MINGW32__ & co are defined.