This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug middle-end/49378] [4.7 Regression] C++ is broken
- From: "hjl.tools at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 14:51:14 +0000
- Subject: [Bug middle-end/49378] [4.7 Regression] C++ is broken
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-49378-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49378
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> 2011-06-12 14:51:12 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Hi,
> looks like I have the lucky kernel.
>
> I think the problem is that we now mark as local thunks that are not having
> address taken that makes i386 BE to use register passing conventions.
>
> Does the following patch help?
>
Can you upload the patch as an attachment? It is hard to apply
it as a comment. Thanks.