This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug tree-optimization/49361] [4.7 Regression] Huge 470.lbm regression
- From: "rguenther at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 11:31:25 +0000
- Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/49361] [4.7 Regression] Huge 470.lbm regression
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-49361-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49361
--- Comment #2 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> 2011-06-10 11:31:07 UTC ---
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49361
>
> --- Comment #1 from William J. Schmidt <wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-06-10 11:23:16 UTC ---
> OK, I'll clean this up.
I'm testing the fold-const.c patch currently and plan to install it
as it makes sense to restrict this canonicalization to non-gimple.