[Bug c/48062] `shadowed declaration is here' should be a note

["momchil at xaxo dot eu" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48062

momchil at xaxo dot eu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |momchil at xaxo dot eu

--- Comment #2 from momchil at xaxo dot eu 2011-06-09 01:46:43 UTC ---
Hi, there is an ambiguity here, consider the following examples:

$ cat > 1.c
int
main(void)
{
    int i;

#pragma GCC diagnostic push
#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wshadow"
    { int i; }
#pragma GCC diagnostic pop
}

$ gcc46 -Wshadow 1.c
1.c: In function 'main':
1.c:4:6: warning: shadowed declaration is here [-Wshadow]

Here I would suppose to see no warning at all, because I have turned it off for
the case that shadows. But:

$ cat > 2.c
int
main(void)
{
#pragma GCC diagnostic push
#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wshadow"
    int i;
#pragma GCC diagnostic pop

    {int i;}
}
$ gcc46 -Wshadow 2.c
2.c: In function 'main':
2.c:9:7: warning: declaration of 'i' shadows a previous local [-Wshadow]

And it is something that I whould also not expect. And now:

$ cat > 3.c
int
main(void)
{
#pragma GCC diagnostic push
#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wshadow"
    int i;
#pragma GCC diagnostic pop

#pragma GCC diagnostic push
#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wshadow"
    { int i; }
#pragma GCC diagnostic pop
}
$ gcc46 -Wshadow 3.c

Produces no warning. So for me it is a bit confusing, since the warning setting
refers to pieces of code and not to variables.