This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug lto/49277] [4.7 Regression] 456.hmmer in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build
- From: "rguenther at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 15:21:40 +0000
- Subject: [Bug lto/49277] [4.7 Regression] 456.hmmer in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-49277-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> 2011-06-07 15:20:37 UTC ---
On Tue, 7 Jun 2011, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
>
> --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> 2011-06-07 15:01:48 UTC ---
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > On Mon, 6 Jun 2011, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote:
>
> >
> > Can you bisect the set of object files (adding -r -nostdlib to the link)
> > and provide preprocessed source for the minimal set of object files that
> > trigger at least one such error?
>
> I will do that.
>
> > The object files are not compatible with the three versions of lto1
> > I have around.
> >
>
> Which revision of GCC are you using? My testcase was compiled by
> revision 174710. I can build my testcase with the same revision of
> your GCCs.
preprocessed source is prefered, otherwise it's hard to minimize
the testcase further.
Richard.