This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug fortran/48279] [4.6/4.7 Regression] segfault in gfc_check_vardef_context
- From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 08:13:20 +0000
- Subject: [Bug fortran/48279] [4.6/4.7 Regression] segfault in gfc_check_vardef_context
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-48279-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48279
Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |ice-on-invalid-code
CC| |burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.1
Summary|segfault in |[4.6/4.7 Regression]
|gfc_check_vardef_context |segfault in
| |gfc_check_vardef_context
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-28 08:13:02 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> call set(get_d_string(h), 0, 'Three')
With NAG and with GCC 4.5 (and 4.3/4.4) I get the error that no specific
function could be found. Thus, I mark this PR now as regression and
ICE-on-invalid-code. I have not checked whether the other examples are valid or
not.