This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libstdc++/48113] [4.6/4.7 Regression] [C++0x] bind with tuple argument fails
- From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 18:04:00 +0000
- Subject: [Bug libstdc++/48113] [4.6/4.7 Regression] [C++0x] bind with tuple argument fails
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-48113-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48113
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-14 18:03:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Currently Bind::f() volatile gives an error during overload resolution but the
> other overload doesn't. Will your fix make both fail?
brain really not firing today ... I meant:
Currently Bind::f() volatile gives an error for F2, but not F1. Will you fix
make both fail?