This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libstdc++/48038] [C++0x] stable_sort problem with C++0x and comparator by value
- From: "chris at bubblescope dot net" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 15:58:29 +0000
- Subject: [Bug libstdc++/48038] [C++0x] stable_sort problem with C++0x and comparator by value
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-48038-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48038
--- Comment #26 from Chris Jefferson <chris at bubblescope dot net> 2011-03-09 15:58:24 UTC ---
But, the first line of the method (of all the methods) is:
VERIFY(rh.ok);
So, we know it's true. That might still look more consistent/clear.
Very sorry about the formatting. If this can wait until tomorrow I can get to a
computer with a better editor. It's time like this I wish I'd ever bothered to
learn emacs or vim, or some other editor that runs on all machines and won't
mangle tabs.