This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/44499] No default constructor available
- From: "dirtyepic at gentoo dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 22:28:50 +0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/44499] No default constructor available
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-44499-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44499
Ryan Hill <dirtyepic at gentoo dot org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dirtyepic at gentoo dot org
--- Comment #10 from Ryan Hill <dirtyepic at gentoo dot org> 2011-03-03 22:28:45 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > gcc is correct, accepting the code previously was a bug that was fixed recently
> >
> > You need to provide an initializer for g_d
>
> This sort of changes should be documented in the changes.html page or in
> porting_to.html
Could this be added? Some upstreams are arguing this is a bug in GCC. In the
past we've found that if it's documented that this change was indeed
intentional, they're more willing to fix their code.