This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libstdc++/47913] [C++0x] improve ratio_add to overflow less often
- From: "marc.glisse at normalesup dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 20:50:48 +0000
- Subject: [Bug libstdc++/47913] [C++0x] improve ratio_add to overflow less often
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-47913-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47913
--- Comment #17 from Marc Glisse <marc.glisse at normalesup dot org> 2011-03-02 20:50:42 UTC ---
Some more examples. Using the constants:
m=INTMAX_MAX;
n=INTMAX_MAX/2;
p=((intmax_t)1<<(4*sizeof(intmax_t)-1))-3
(m,2)-(m,3)==(m,6) boost should manage this one
(m/7*5-1,5)-(m-2,7) __big_mul would be enough (__big_div is the hard thing)
(n-5,15)+(n,35) one could cheat by removing the integral part
(p^2,(2*p-3)*(p-2))-(p+2,(p-1)*(p-2)) one may be able to write gcd=(p-2), p^2
as (p+2)*gcd+4 and the computation of the numerator becomes
gcd*((p+2)*(p-1)-(2*p-3))+4*(p-1)-4*(2*p-3) and both computations
(p+2)*(p-1)-(2*p-3) and 4*(p-1)-4*(2*p-3) fit in a intmax_t. But with a larger
gcd, they may not (I'll try to add an example later).