This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug c/36299] spurious and undocumented warning with -Waddress for a == 0 when a is an array


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36299

--- Comment #7 from Vincent LefÃvre <vincent at vinc17 dot org> 2011-03-02 01:15:23 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> I think the intention is to warn, at least for a == (void *)0, since the
> address of a cannot be zero or null. So I would say that this is a regression.

But this is valid in C, and in practice, such a test can occur in macro
expansions: a macro can check whether some pointer is null before doing
something with it. There shouldn't be a warning in such a case.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]