This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug c++/42810] Enumeration with sequential values has its for-loop exit condition optimized out.



------- Comment #23 from tony3 at GarlandConsulting dot us  2010-01-28 17:16 -------
Jonathan,

Thanks for explaining that operation outside the norm is unspecified such
that the compiler can do anything and everything.

>I think a warning for this would be helpful, but asking for the compiler to
>assume types can have values that they can't have is not a good idea.

In the absence of making enumerations more useful (in the standard--which is
unlikely), I completely agree: a warning would be helpful.

Enough said by me.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42810


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]