This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug middle-end/19988] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] pessimizes fp multiply-add/subtract combo
- From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 16 Jan 2010 20:30:03 -0000
- Subject: [Bug middle-end/19988] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] pessimizes fp multiply-add/subtract combo
- References: <bug-19988-9955@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #21 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-16 20:30 -------
(In reply to comment #20)
> It obviously could do the same. It all depends on the answer to this
> question:
> Do we want to deal with this via canonicalization of expressions, and if
> yes, then also on the outcome of our discussion of where that should happen
> (fold or special code in VN dealing with just value numbers).
> If no, then something like your patch can be done.
>
> In this case I'm leaning towards Paolo (comment #14), we possibly might want
> to canonicalize towards fewer constants (hence towards positive constants),
> when otherwise the number of operations remains the same (hence treating
> PLUS_EXPR and MINUS_EXPR as equivalent).
Yes, that sounds reasonable. Note that most existing foldings only look
for PLUS_EXPR once the 2nd operand is a constant, so auditing of them is
required.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19988