This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug lto/42665] Internal compiler exception in with gfortran when using -fwhole-program -flto -fopenmp
- From: "jjcogliati-r1 at yahoo dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 12 Jan 2010 21:14:09 -0000
- Subject: [Bug lto/42665] Internal compiler exception in with gfortran when using -fwhole-program -flto -fopenmp
- References: <bug-42665-12362@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #12 from jjcogliati-r1 at yahoo dot com 2010-01-12 21:14 -------
(In reply to comment #10)
> Subject: Re: Internal compiler exception in with gfortran
> when using -fwhole-program -flto -fopenmp
>
> On Mon, 11 Jan 2010, jjcogliati-r1 at yahoo dot com wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > ------- Comment #9 from jjcogliati-r1 at yahoo dot com 2010-01-11 17:15 -------
> > My hunch, (and I could be wrong since my knowledge of gcc's tree code was zero
> > as of Friday morning) is that it is trying to find the array's min and max
> > size, but that only the min location is available, and that the max value is
> > undefined. Since this is fortran code, there are a number of places that I do
> > that. Is that plausible, and if so, how would I check this hunch?
>
> It should never be error_mark_node ...
>
> > Getting permission for me to get you the full code would involve a lot of
> > bureaucracy (weeks to months).
>
> Oh, I see ...
>
> You could try putting an assert in
> lto-streamer-out.c:lto_output_ts_type_tree_pointers so that
> the TYPE_MIN/MAXVAL are not error_mark_node.
>
> That would point you to the file and function.
>
> Richard.
>
That did the trick. Thank you.
Added lto-streamer-out.c:lto_output_ts_type_tree_pointers:
else if (TREE_CODE (expr) == ARRAY_TYPE) {
+ gcc_assert(TYPE_MAX_VALUE (TYPE_DOMAIN (expr) ) == NULL ||
+ TREE_CODE (TYPE_MAX_VALUE (TYPE_DOMAIN (expr) )) != ERROR_MARK
);
lto_output_tree_or_ref (ob, TYPE_DOMAIN (expr), ref_p);
}
I can now trigger the original ice with the following valid (I think) code:
!list_use.f90
program list_use
use list_test
implicit none
integer, dimension(10) :: a_list
a_list = 1
call loop_list(a_list)
end program list_use
!list_test.f90
module list_test
!$ use omp_lib
implicit none
contains
subroutine loop_list(list)
integer, intent(in), dimension(:) :: list
integer :: ii
!$ integer :: chunk_size
!$ chunk_size = 4
!$OMP PARALLEL DO SCHEDULE(dynamic,chunk_size)
do ii=1,size(list)
call do_things(list, ii)
end do
end subroutine loop_list
subroutine do_things(list, index)
integer, intent(in),dimension(:) :: list
integer, intent(in) :: index
print *,size(list),index
end subroutine do_things
end module list_test
$ ~/gcc/old4_gcc45/bin/gfortran -Wall -o list_use -fopenmp -fwhole-program
-flto list_test.f90 list_use.f90
lto1: internal compiler error: in iterative_hash_expr, at tree.c:6592
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
lto-wrapper: /home/jjc/gcc/old4_gcc45/bin/gfortran returned 1 exit status
collect2: lto-wrapper returned 1 exit status
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42665