This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libstdc++/24803] [c++0x] reference_wrapper and pointers to member functions
- From: "paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 12 Jan 2010 18:07:52 -0000
- Subject: [Bug libstdc++/24803] [c++0x] reference_wrapper and pointers to member functions
- References: <bug-24803-3433@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #22 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-12 18:07 -------
Interesting... lately people (*) are apparently happy with all sorts of
regressions wrt C++98/TR1...
Anyway, then let's close it, actually I leave to you the choice between fixed,
wontfix and invalid ;)
(*) Stephan at least is also happy with std::vector & co not explicitly
instantiable anymore for non-DefaultConstructible types: if I remember all the
time I spent with Matt Austern encouragement to tweak all our containers for
that... Agreed, the new philosophy of adding requirements to the specific
members allows more flexibility together with non-moveable types, etc, but in
my opinion it really makes sense only together with Concepts where you can
elegantly make a member "disappear" depending on a Require clause... bah...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24803