This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libstdc++/41351] std::rotate on RAI does not conform to ISO complexity requirement
- From: "paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 30 Oct 2009 19:39:17 -0000
- Subject: [Bug libstdc++/41351] std::rotate on RAI does not conform to ISO complexity requirement
- References: <bug-41351-18186@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #43 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-10-30 19:39 -------
Ok, thanks a lot for the benchmarks, I'll try to come to the numbers as soon as
possible. However, I suggest posting to the mailing list, to make sure all the
interested people follow the discussion. Also, as I tried to say already,
please don't use std::copy, doesn't work, regtesting fails for move-only types.
That's important also to not make bad judgements when comparing different
algorithms, some of course simply are not viable for move-only types.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41351