This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug tree-optimization/38401] TreeSSA-PRE load after store misoptimization



------- Comment #15 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-12-15 17:38 -------
Re. comment #14: Yes, I suppose so.  Why do you want to remove gcse-las from
mainline.  Not that I'm against it -- ideally RTL gcse.c would not work on
memory at all anymore -- but I wouldn't remove gcse-las until we catch in the
GIMPLE optimizers as much as possible of the things we still need gcse-las for.

It seems to me, btw, that it might be easier to teach GIMPLE loop invariant
code motion about this transformation.  Adding this in GIMPLE PRE might be a
little too expensive...?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38401


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]