This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/36631] [4.3/4.4 Regression] attribute always_inline -> sorry, unimplemented: recursive inlining
- From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 21 Oct 2008 12:15:01 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/36631] [4.3/4.4 Regression] attribute always_inline -> sorry, unimplemented: recursive inlining
- References: <bug-36631-16302@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #7 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-21 12:15 -------
Is there a reason why we have to set
CALL_CANNOT_INLINE_P/gimple_call_cannot_inline already during gimplification?
If we defer setting it till say to lower_stmt, then by that time all the
fndecls will be surely genericized and it will be still before anything will
look at
gimple_call_cannot_inline (ipa-inline.c, {,re}build_cgraph_edges, cfgexpand).
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36631