This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug libstdc++/37811] bind1st fails on mem_fun with reference argument



------- Comment #3 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com  2008-10-13 15:27 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> Deprecated or not, shouldn't it work up until when it is actually removed?

It works perfectly well, as designed, without regressions, it's just that
implementing the resolution of library DR 109:

  http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#109

causes this rejection. As I said already, these issues are *known* by the
Committee and that's why those facilities are considered unreparably flawed in
general, thus deprecated, and replaced by bind in C++0x.


-- 

paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37811


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]