This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/37773] -Wfatal-errors aborts too early
- From: "pinskia at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 8 Oct 2008 16:57:04 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/37773] -Wfatal-errors aborts too early
- References: <bug-37773-7035@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #2 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-10-08 16:57 -------
Subject: Re: -Wfatal-errors aborts too early
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 8, 2008, at 9:48 AM, "carlo at gcc dot gnu dot org"
<gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
> wrote:
>
>
> ------- Comment #1 from carlo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-08
> 16:48 -------
> Here's another one:
This expected behaviour of this option. It was not designed for users
really to use it. It was designed to make it easier and faster for
automatic reduction of ICEs.
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
>
>
> ../cwchessboard/PgnDatabase.cc:65: error: no matching function for
> call to
> â??util::MemoryBlockList::append(gssize&)â??
> ../cwchessboard/MemoryBlockList.h:232: note: candidates are: void
> util::MemoryBlockList::append(Glib::RefPtr<util::MemoryBlockNode>&,
> size_t)
>
> With -Wfatal-errors the second line is not printed.
>
>
> --
>
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37773
>
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37773