This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/37728] if scoping for declarations
- From: "pinskia at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 3 Oct 2008 18:23:47 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/37728] if scoping for declarations
- References: <bug-37728-1447@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-10-03 18:23 -------
Subject: Re: New: if scoping for declarations
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 3, 2008, at 11:10 AM, "mrs at apple dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
> wrote:
> In:
>
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2008-October/017449.html
>
> we were discussing possible bugs in g++ scoping for if statements.
>
> $ cat t.cc
> void foo() {
> if (int x = 0) {
> int x;
> }
> }
This is invalid C++ but it is valid C99. There is already a duplicated
bug filed for this too but I am too lazy right now to find it.
>
> $ ./xgcc -B./ -c t.cc
> $
>
> they expected this to produce a redeclaration error on the inner
> declaration
> for X.
>
> Tested on gcc version 4.4.0 20081003 (experimental) [trunk revision
> 140855]
> (GCC)
>
> There were other concerns about for, but, others seem to think gcc
> does the
> right thing with them.
>
>
> --
> Summary: if scoping for declarations
> Product: gcc
> Version: 4.4.0
> Status: UNCONFIRMED
> Severity: normal
> Priority: P3
> Component: c++
> AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
> ReportedBy: mrs at apple dot com
>
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37728
>
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37728