This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [Bug preprocessor/37550] New: Please document predefined sub-architecture support macros




Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 16, 2008, at 7:35 PM, "martinrb at google dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org > wrote:

The preprocessor symbol __MMX__ indicates whether this gcc
includes mmx support.  This is extremely useful, but undocumented.
I only found out by finding the symbol in other peoples' code.

Some targets actually define this based some specifications of the target. Spu and -mcpu=cell on powerpc define __SPU__/__PPU__ as specified by the C/C++ language extension for the cbea document. I bet x86 has this specified in their documentation rather than in GCC's documentation.




The particular symbol __MMX__ should be documented in
the obvious place, namely where the -mmmx flag is documented
in the x86-specific page.

And of course, similarly for other such predefined flags.
I assume there's one for sse, but I haven't actually tried to find out.


Here's a shell transcript, again compiling my favorite
source file, /dev/null:

(martinrb@spraggett) ~ $ gcc -mmmx -E -dD -x c /dev/null | sort > / tmp/t1
(martinrb@spraggett) ~ $ gcc -mno-mmx -E -dD -x c /dev/null | sort > /tmp/t2
(martinrb@spraggett) ~ $ diff /tmp/t[12]
92d91
< #define __MMX__ 1



-- Summary: Please document predefined sub-architecture support macros Product: gcc Version: 4.2.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: preprocessor AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: martinrb at google dot com GCC host triplet: x86_64-linux-gnu


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37550




Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]