This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug middle-end/37491] [4.4 Regression] Revision 140257 causes vectorizer tests failures
- From: "rguenther at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 15 Sep 2008 09:39:05 -0000
- Subject: [Bug middle-end/37491] [4.4 Regression] Revision 140257 causes vectorizer tests failures
- References: <bug-37491-682@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de 2008-09-15 09:39 -------
Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] Revision 140257 causes
vectorizer tests failures
On Mon, 15 Sep 2008, irar at il dot ibm dot com wrote:
>
>
> ------- Comment #9 from irar at il dot ibm dot com 2008-09-15 09:35 -------
> (In reply to comment #8)
> > Well, I think the ICE happens because for stores we call
> > vect_create_data_ref_ptr with an explicit vector type which is based on
> > the rhs, not the lhs. The ICE should never occur if we based the
> > vector type on the lhs.
>
> No, no. The ICE occurs when we base the vector type on the lhs!
> vector void (*<T48f>) (int) * ivtmp.30;
> vector void (*<T49a>) (int_t) vect_cst_.23;
>
> *ivtmp.30_13 = vect_cst_.23_9;
> The rhs and the lhs are not the same (and do not alias).
The rhs ans the lhs do not need to alias. The important thing is that
the *ivtmp.30_13 aliases the original scalar store - if *ivtmp.30_13
is based on the scalar lhs type this will be always the case.
I am going to have a look myself (not right now, but somewhen this
week) - feel free to assign this bug to me for now.
Thanks,
Richard.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37491