This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug middle-end/37151] New: [4.4 Regression] ICE with -fprofile-use and -ftree-loop-linear
- From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 18 Aug 2008 16:21:24 -0000
- Subject: [Bug middle-end/37151] New: [4.4 Regression] ICE with -fprofile-use and -ftree-loop-linear
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
Polyhedron benchmark's mdbx (http://www.polyhedron.co.uk/MFL6VW74649)
gfortran -fprofile-generate -ffast-math -march=opteron -ftree-loop-linear -O3
mdbx.f90
./a.out
gfortran -fprofile-use -ffast-math -march=opteron -ftree-loop-linear -O3
mdbx.f90
gives an segmentation fault. No segfault without -ffast-math or
without -ftree-loop-linear
Valgrind reports:
==23369== Invalid read of size 8
==23369== at 0x4D05B3: ggc_set_mark (ggc-page.c:579)
==23369== by 0x48ABB4: gt_ggc_mx_lang_tree_node (gt-fortran-f95-lang.h:49)
==23369== by 0x62A03C: gt_ggc_mx_rtx_def (gtype-desc.c:1500)
==23369== by 0x48ADB6: gt_ggc_mx_lang_tree_node (gt-fortran-f95-lang.h:204)
==23369== by 0x6228E4: gt_ggc_mx_varpool_node (gtype-desc.c:118)
==23369== by 0x5F9826: ggc_mark_roots (ggc-common.c:107)
==23369== by 0x4D1097: ggc_collect (ggc-page.c:1941)
==23369== by 0x66DC04: execute_todo (passes.c:1050)
==23369== by 0x66DE90: execute_one_pass (passes.c:1304)
==23369== by 0x66E064: execute_pass_list (passes.c:1330)
==23369== by 0x66E07C: execute_pass_list (passes.c:1331)
==23369== by 0x66E07C: execute_pass_list (passes.c:1331)
==23369== Address 0x8 is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
mdbx.f90: In function 'mstep':
mdbx.f90:822: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
--
Summary: [4.4 Regression] ICE with -fprofile-use and -ftree-loop-
linear
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37151