[Bug libstdc++/37147] New failures: 20_util/ratio/comparisons/comp2.cc et al

["hp at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>]

------- Comment #4 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-08-18 14:05 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> Something you should also immediately check is whether those tests actually
> were run before the changes and not skipped,

You're right, all of
20_util/ratio/comparisons/comp2.cc
20_util/ratio/operations/ops2.cc
20_util/ratio/operations/ops3.cc
were UNSUPPORTED as of 139006.  The reason they show up as regressions is that
they have actually passed at least once since 2008-05-30 14:24:17 (r136209, the
last regression-free revision for cris-elf, not counting xfails).  Ignoring 
PASS -> UNSUPPORTED or PASS -> deleted while not in a regression-free state is
a feature of the regression tester.  Sorry for the confusion, I should have
double-checked.

Yes, likely the GLIBCXX_CHECK_C99_TR1 macro should be tightened.

Please ignore 27_io/basic_ostream/inserters_other/char/error_code.cc mentioned
in this PR.  It will get a separate PR; it showed up at an earlier revision;
not the same cause or behavior.

I'm not sure, do you still need more information?


-- 

hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|[4.4 Regression]:           |New failures:
                   |20_util/ratio/comparisons/co|20_util/ratio/comparisons/co
                   |mp2.cc et al                |mp2.cc et al


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37147