This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug fortran/36403] [4.4 Regression] Some fortran tests using eoshift fail on SH
- From: "domob at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 28 Jul 2008 18:41:36 -0000
- Subject: [Bug fortran/36403] [4.4 Regression] Some fortran tests using eoshift fail on SH
- References: <bug-36403-5208@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #4 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-28 18:41 -------
Thanks for all the hints, Tobias! I've had a look through the F2003 standard
about intrinsics taking optional char arguments, and it seems as though PACK
and RESHAPE would suffer from the same problem as EOSHIFT does (optional string
argument whose type is not even specified as to be always string), and tests
showed that here too the call to the library function has one less argument
when the optional string argument is not present... This is probably a problem
there, too, isn't it?
None of those have their own conv_intrinsic_ functions at the moment (for all
of them the if matches, as they all return non-scalar values). Is it ok if I
try to write one generic conv-function for this case and call it for all the
three intrinsics?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36403