This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libstdc++/36924] [4.4 Regression] Revision 138087 breaks libstdc++
- From: "paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 24 Jul 2008 22:06:18 -0000
- Subject: [Bug libstdc++/36924] [4.4 Regression] Revision 138087 breaks libstdc++
- References: <bug-36924-682@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #1 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-07-24 22:06 -------
I suppose you can believe me if I tell you that I care about libstdc++-v3.
Then, commit 138087 cannot have anything to do with these failures, really,
believe me. Actually, I suspect 138092 is ""at fault"". Are you 101% sure about
138087? Can you double check, please?
Then, libstdc++ is currently not broken at all. These two testcases, involving
an optional, extension allocator, in an optional mode, are known to be very
brittle, already failed on and off on various targets, many times in the past.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36924