This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/36713] [4.4 regression] r137252 breaks -O2 optimization on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
- From: "dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 3 Jul 2008 12:45:50 -0000
- Subject: [Bug target/36713] [4.4 regression] r137252 breaks -O2 optimization on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
- References: <bug-36713-13648@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #11 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-03 12:45 -------
> I guess the assembly is different, right?
Yes, it is. Comparing *.s files from FCFLAGS="-O2 -save-temps", there are
differences in one file - though not the one suspected in comment #7.
There is one difference in the .optimized file that I could easily identify:
- D.1935 = dummy_atom_model_inertia_tensor (this, phase);
- __result_dummy_atom_model_rad.21 = inertia_tensor_to_rg (&D.1935);
+ D.1935 = dummy_atom_model_inertia_tensor (this, phase) [return slot
optimization];
+ __result_dummy_atom_model_rad.21 = inertia_tensor_to_rg (&D.1935) [tail
call];
And there are plenty in *.alias, e.g.:
Aliased symbols
-D.1935, UID D.1935, struct inertia_tensor, is addressable, score: 8, direct
reads: 0, direct writes: 0, indirect reads: 0, indirect writes: 2, call
clobbered (passed to call)
+D.1935, UID D.1935, struct inertia_tensor, is addressable, score: 0, direct
reads: 0, direct writes: 0, indirect reads: 0, indirect writes: 0
The difference file has 3000+ lines here, one could argue that the dumps are
significantly different ;)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36713