This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/36478] New: [4.3/4.4 regression] warning not emitted when code expanded from macro
- From: "tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 9 Jun 2008 16:33:20 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/36478] New: [4.3/4.4 regression] warning not emitted when code expanded from macro
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a copy of a bug report from Red Hat's bugzilla:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449191
The bug is that with mapped locations, the code in check_empty_body
does not notice that the while() from the macro expansion violates the
rule. This is because of the hack we needed to get decent error messages
with mapped locations -- tokens resulting from a macro expansion are all
given the location of the start of the expansion.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. compile example program:
> cat warn2.cc
int
main(int, char**)
{
#define XXX while(0);
XXX ;
while (0);
}
> g++ -W -Werror -c warn2.cc
Actual results:
cc1plus: warnings being treated as errors
warn2.cc: In function ?int main(int, char**)?:
warn2.cc:6: error: suggest a space before ?;? or explicit braces around empty
body in ?while? statement
Expected results:
warn2.cc: In function ?int main(int, char**)?:
warn2.cc:5: warning: suggest a space before ?;? or explicit braces around empty
body in ?while? statement
warn2.cc:6: warning: suggest a space before ?;? or explicit braces around empty
body in ?while? statement
--
Summary: [4.3/4.4 regression] warning not emitted when code
expanded from macro
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36478