This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug testsuite/36440] [4.4 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/cdce3.C on powerpc-apple-darwin8.5.0



------- Comment #2 from davidxl at google dot com  2008-06-06 18:00 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> The failures disappear with the following patch:
> 
> --- /opt/gcc/_gcc_clean/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cdce3.C    2008-06-05
> 08:50:23.000000000 +0200
> +++ /opt/gcc/gcc-4.4-work/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cdce3.C  2008-06-06
> 13:50:12.000000000 +0200
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -/* { dg-do  run { target { ! "*-*-darwin" } } } */
> +/* { dg-do  run { target { ! "*-*-darwin*" } } } */
>  /* { dg-options "-O2 -fmath-errno -fdump-tree-cdce-details  -lm" } */
>  /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump  "cdce3.C:68: note: function call is
> shrink-wrapped into error conditions\." "cdce" } }*/
>  /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump  "cdce3.C:69: note: function call is
> shrink-wrapped into error conditions\." "cdce" } }*/
> 
> (at least on i686-apple-darwin9).
> 

I wonder why gcc.dg/cdce1.c and gcc.dg/cdce2.c do not fail in the same way?

David


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36440


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]