This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug testsuite/36440] [4.4 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/cdce3.C on powerpc-apple-darwin8.5.0
- From: "davidxl at google dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 6 Jun 2008 18:00:53 -0000
- Subject: [Bug testsuite/36440] [4.4 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/cdce3.C on powerpc-apple-darwin8.5.0
- References: <bug-36440-12313@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #2 from davidxl at google dot com 2008-06-06 18:00 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> The failures disappear with the following patch:
>
> --- /opt/gcc/_gcc_clean/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cdce3.C 2008-06-05
> 08:50:23.000000000 +0200
> +++ /opt/gcc/gcc-4.4-work/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cdce3.C 2008-06-06
> 13:50:12.000000000 +0200
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -/* { dg-do run { target { ! "*-*-darwin" } } } */
> +/* { dg-do run { target { ! "*-*-darwin*" } } } */
> /* { dg-options "-O2 -fmath-errno -fdump-tree-cdce-details -lm" } */
> /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "cdce3.C:68: note: function call is
> shrink-wrapped into error conditions\." "cdce" } }*/
> /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "cdce3.C:69: note: function call is
> shrink-wrapped into error conditions\." "cdce" } }*/
>
> (at least on i686-apple-darwin9).
>
I wonder why gcc.dg/cdce1.c and gcc.dg/cdce2.c do not fail in the same way?
David
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36440