This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug tree-optimization/36100] [4.4 Regression] always_inline attribute is broken at -O0
- From: "hubicka at ucw dot cz" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 2 May 2008 21:59:36 -0000
- Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/36100] [4.4 Regression] always_inline attribute is broken at -O0
- References: <bug-36100-682@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #8 from hubicka at ucw dot cz 2008-05-02 21:59 -------
Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] always_inline attribute is broken at -O0
> FAIL: g++.dg/opt/pr30965.C scan-tree-dump-times optimized ";; Function" 2
> FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/va-arg-pack-1.c compilation, -O0
> FAIL: gcc.dg/attr-alwaysinline.c scan-assembler-not sabrina
> FAIL: gcc.dg/winline-4.c (test for warnings, line 4)
> FAIL: gcc.dg/winline-4.c (test for warnings, line 7)
> FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/nested-fn-1.c -O0 scan-assembler-not should_not_appear
> FAIL: gcc.target/i386/20060512-1.c (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: gcc.target/i386/20060512-3.c (test for excess errors)
All C failures I get with the patch applied are the following:
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/packed-1.c -O2 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/builtin-math-4.c -O0 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/builtin-math-4.c -O1 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/builtin-math-4.c -O2 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/builtin-math-4.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer (test for
excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/builtin-math-4.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
(test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/builtin-math-4.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
-funroll-all-loops -finline-functions (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/builtin-math-4.c -O3 -g (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/builtin-math-4.c -Os (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr34999.c compilation, -fprofile-use -D_PROFILE_USE
So hopefully all of those are fixed now.
I will look into pr30965.C now.
My apologizes for the breakage. Testing empty patches is obviously easy
job :(
Honza
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36100