This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug fortran/35769] inappropriate FORALL error



------- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-03-30 21:27 -------
Confirm. I agree that it is valid (although bad style) code.

I think there should be no warning printed if a index-name is used in the
scalar-mask-expr. Otherwise, if it is neither used in the scalar-mask-expr nor
in the forall-body-construct, I think it makes sense to print a warning; this
is actually was ifort does.


-- 

burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
           Keywords|                            |rejects-valid
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2008-03-30 21:27:35
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35769


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]