This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug middle-end/33088] [4.1/4.2 regression] spurious exceptions with -ffloat-store



------- Comment #16 from rguenther at suse dot de  2008-03-13 17:02 -------
Subject: Re:  [4.1/4.2 regression] spurious exceptions
 with -ffloat-store

On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:

> ------- Comment #15 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-03-13 17:00 -------
> I think this patch causes invalid gimple to show up at -O0 .  With my patches
> to detect invalid gimple shows that there are a lot of failures with complex
> and -O0.  Did the definition of what is valid gimple for complex at -O0 change?

No.  I also recognized that we still set DECL_IS_GIMPLE_REG but
is_gimple_reg says it is not.

We should go into SSA for -O0 as well and fix this for real.

Richard.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33088


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]