This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug middle-end/35509] [4.3/4.4 Regression] builtin isinf() mismatch to compile-time substitution
- From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 8 Mar 2008 15:55:27 -0000
- Subject: [Bug middle-end/35509] [4.3/4.4 Regression] builtin isinf() mismatch to compile-time substitution
- References: <bug-35509-6291@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-08 15:55 -------
I don't think this is even a QOI bug. The values are defined by the C99
standard. If the person used -std=c89, then he would get what the target's
libc defines them. The inconstaint value is ok at different optimization level
too because only non-zero and zero are defined as return values.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35509